
For laboratory directors and operations managers, the “Make vs. Buy” decision is a constant balancing act. The conventional wisdom often suggests that bringing assays in-house is the gold standard for cost control. The logic is linear: buy the equipment, buy the reagents, and cut out the middleman’s margin.
For high-volume, routine testing, this logic holds. However, when it comes to complex, low-volume multiplex panels—particularly in the fast-moving world of infectious disease—the math changes dramatically.
When you look beyond the price of the kit and calculate the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), the “cheaper” in-house option often reveals itself to be a drain on both budget and efficiency.
Here is why the smartest labs are pivoting to an outsourcing model for their complex portfolios, and how BioCipher turns variable risks into fixed advantages.
When calculating the cost of an in-house assay, it is easy to fixate on the visible costs (reagents and plasticware). But for complex multiplexing, the Capital Expenditure (CapEx) and Operating Expenses (OpEx) create an iceberg effect.
Developing or verifying a complex 20-target pathogen panel is not a “plug-and-play” operation. It requires rigorous validation.
The Cost: You are paying for reagents that generate no revenue, and more importantly, you are burning weeks of scientist hours on optimization rather than production.
The Reality: If your sample volume is low (e.g., ad-hoc testing or small batches), the amortization of those validation costs per sample skyrockets. You might be paying rupees 20 for reagents, but rupees 200 per sample in amortized setup costs.
Maintaining specialized thermal cyclers and liquid handlers for low-volume runs is inefficient. If a machine sits idle for three days a week, your Return on Assets (ROA) plummets. Furthermore, maintenance contracts and calibration costs remain fixed, regardless of whether you run 10 samples or 1,000.
Perhaps the most significant hidden cost is human capital.
Complex infectious disease panels require “tribal knowledge.” They are finicky. They require senior technicians to troubleshoot primer-dimers, analyze difficult amplification curves, and handle sensitive enzymes.
Ask yourself: Is it the best use of your most talented technician’s time to babysit a low-volume, temperamental assay?
By outsourcing complex panels to Biocipher, you create a division of labor that maximizes ROI:
Your Team: Focuses on high-volume, standard tests where throughput and speed generate the bulk of your revenue/data.
Our Team: Manages the cutting-edge, complex infectious disease portfolio. Because this is all we do, we operate at an efficiency scale that individual labs cannot replicate.
In-house assays carry variable risks:
What if the validation fails and needs to be repeated?
What if a bulk reagent kit expires before we use it all?
What if the instrument breaks down mid-run?
All of these scenarios blow holes in a budget.
Outsourcing to BioCipher converts these variable risks into a Fixed Cost Advantage. You pay a predictable price per result. We absorb the risk of reagent spoilage. We absorb the cost of instrument downtime. We absorb the R&D time required to keep panels up to date with the latest pathogen variants.
If you are running thousands of the same simple test every month, build it in-house.
However, if you are managing a portfolio of complex, multi-target panels with variable sample volumes, the TCO almost always favors the specialist.
Outsourcing isn’t just about handing over samples; it’s about handing over the complexity so your lab can run leaner and faster.
Don’t rely on back-of-the-napkin math. Let us show you the real numbers.
Contact us today, and we will provide a detailed comparison of your current in-house spending versus the ROI of partnering with BioCipher for your complex panel portfolio.